The most famous of them all, of course, was Jack the Ripper who terrorized London in the latter part of the nineteenth century. You would think that with the modern-day serial killers who have kill counts numbering in the double digits, Jack the Ripper, whose known kill count was only five, would've paled in comparison. But no. What made him stand out? He got away with it. And up to this day, nobody knows who he really was.
And then there's his nightmarish M.O. His targets were all prostitutes, who by the nature of their profession would want to take their customers to the most dark and hidden street corners of Victorian London. The best place to commit a crime, wouldn't it? He then would stealthily approach his victim from the back, grab her by the hair, quickly slit her throat twice, then eviscerate her innards, leaving the body in such a way that people who would later find the corpse could only recoil in disgust at the inhumanity and the degradation of it all.
So you begin to question yourself: how could such a person do such barbaric acts? Was there something in his past that would've driven him to commit such abominations? Is it possible that someone was just made that way - that is, if the theory of a 'criminal DNA' is real - did he possess it? How can someone be able to do such things without feeling guilt or remorse and probably derive satisfaction, enjoyment, and thrill from doing so?
And then there's the frightening thought that such people actually do co-exist with us. He could be your neighbor, a friend, an acquaintance - someone you would never associate with the term 'serial killer'. It is not the presence of a criminal aura that sets a serial killer apart they say. It is actually the complete lack of it.
Another thing that makes me wonder is how come I don't get to hear any Filipino version of serial killers? Sure there were in the past deadly and brutal multiple killings but in a way they are also a little bit different. Maybe because these incidents were only committed once as opposed to being committed over a period of time by a single person? Anyway, I'm definitely not wishing that similar things happen here. I was just wondering whether the serial killer phenomenon is purely a Western idea. Or if such things are happening here as well but are just not being reported or recognized for what they truly are.
But I suppose my real fascination with the Jack the Ripper story is not with him or his hideous acts alone but with the power of the human psyche itself. The human brain is truly a wonderful but sometimes a truly terrifying thing. It is capable of thinking up great ideals resulting in man's progress. But it is also quite capable of committing acts that could only be described as insane.
Photo from jadugar.wordpress.com
2 comments:
Yeah, I've watched that way back. There's also a Discovery special on female serial killers. Have you seen that one? Quite interesting too. No slitting of throats, just the die-slowly methods like arsenic poisoning or starving their victims kinda thing.
Pinoy version? Yeah, you're right. No infamous serial killers, only the one-time big-time ones like the one who was responsible for the chop-chop lady and the the recent Maguindanao massacre. Perhaps Pinoys are fonder of being one-hit wonders.
Or perhaps there are Pinoy serial killers but nobody was able to keep track of them because of our country's crude and corrupted justice system and crime units.
Yep, I've seen that special about female serial killers. Really evil stuff right there. Especially that one about the Hungarian aristocrat Erzsebet Bathory who murdered hundreds of women so she can bathe in their blood, believing it would keep her looking young. That one's pretty crazy.
I'm glad serial killers aren't a big issue here. (cheers?) Japan, I think, is the only Asian country that had some. We do have a lot of political killings though, but that's another story. ~_~
Post a Comment